There are a few myths regarding the Heathrow expansion.
Firstly that the north of the country won't feel the benefits from it expanding, this is a lie.
I work for a small firm who's main contract is with Heathrow, 24% of the companies we deal with on daily basis have the HQ's north of the Watford Gap, including some companies based in Scotland.
Telford, Sheffield, Newcastle, Worcester, Glasgow, Darlington, Stone, Warrington, Keighly, Renfrewshire, Derby are to name but a few areas of the country that get business through Heathrow expanding.
Not only will the north of the country, and Scotland benefit for a third runway, but the south too.
Exeter, Swindon, Berkshire, Oxfordshire, Middlesex, Essex are to name but a few other areas that will feel the benefits.
These are areas the company I work for deal with, and we are a small company, imagine all the other areas of the country that will benefit.
Jobs will be made, houses will be built, investments will be made.
Also the expense of expanding Heathrow isn't as high as some other ideas, £18.6 billion, which if we add another £10 billion for mistakes (it's Britain, there will be mistakes, setbacks etc) whic tallies it up to £28.6 billion.
Boris Island, the most ludicrous idea ever thought up, could have cost us £100 billion!
HS2 is costing £30 billion, again add on another £10 billion for mistakes, makes it £40 billion.
Heathrow expansion is by far the cheapest, easiest, and most beneficial for the whole country.
Tuesday 25 October 2016
Thursday 20 October 2016
Clinton or Trump? Neither!
I have to be honest, I am ashamed at USA right now, out of the 318.9 million people it's Hilary Clinton vs Donald Trump who are running against each other to become the next President of the USA, the most power country in the world.
Here we have two people who are beyond corrupt.
Clinton is clever, which in one way makes her, in my opinion, more dangerous than Trump.
That's not only what bothers me about her, she's getting away with someone she would persecute another over.
Her emails got leaked out because she, cleverly, used her family's private email server instead of the secure and official State Department emails, and because of this clever move, her emails were leaked, which she has denied has happened......
What was leaked? "We must destroy Syria for Israel"
Edward Snowden, a man I am not a fan of, leaked vital information, now they want to persecute him, and knowing the USA, possibly execute him.
Because of her last name she can run for President, because of his last name Snowden runs for safety..... fair? Not exactly.
Then there's Trump, a racist, homophobic, sexist pillock, who is rich thanks to his grand father, and father.
He's friend's with Vladimir Putin, which would be a good thing if Trump wasn't as thick, and Putin, should Trump win, would take advantage of.
He see women as a play thing for his own amusement, a bit like Hilary's husband.
Then there's his daft ideas to build walls to keep people out, and have them pay for this wall.
I haven't really listened to the debates between these two because they are the two sides of corruption.
One thick, the other smart, and I can't decide which one is the less evil of the two.... can you?
Here we have two people who are beyond corrupt.
Clinton is clever, which in one way makes her, in my opinion, more dangerous than Trump.
That's not only what bothers me about her, she's getting away with someone she would persecute another over.
Her emails got leaked out because she, cleverly, used her family's private email server instead of the secure and official State Department emails, and because of this clever move, her emails were leaked, which she has denied has happened......
What was leaked? "We must destroy Syria for Israel"
Edward Snowden, a man I am not a fan of, leaked vital information, now they want to persecute him, and knowing the USA, possibly execute him.
Because of her last name she can run for President, because of his last name Snowden runs for safety..... fair? Not exactly.
Then there's Trump, a racist, homophobic, sexist pillock, who is rich thanks to his grand father, and father.
He's friend's with Vladimir Putin, which would be a good thing if Trump wasn't as thick, and Putin, should Trump win, would take advantage of.
He see women as a play thing for his own amusement, a bit like Hilary's husband.
Then there's his daft ideas to build walls to keep people out, and have them pay for this wall.
I haven't really listened to the debates between these two because they are the two sides of corruption.
One thick, the other smart, and I can't decide which one is the less evil of the two.... can you?
Wednesday 19 October 2016
Child Refugees
Should child refugees from the Calais jungle be helped? Absolutely!
Should we, Britain, be taking them in, in order to give children safety and security? Of course!
However some of these children who have been accepted, some of them don't look like children.
Now it may be the case, like in mine, where they look older than their years.
If they are children, and they have come from war torn Syria, then yes the travelling and the worrying will have aged some of them.
However, if it turns out that we have accepted adults posing as children, then what about the real children who are being left behind?
What about the children who literally are just that, children of 8 or 10, living on their own, or trying to look after younger siblings/ family members, and are stuck in the Calais jungle because of fraudsters?
When people were talking about bringing over child refugees, I honestly thought I was going to be seeing babies through to 10/14 year olds, not teenagers/ men.
Again, I will re-iterate that these teenagers might be 14 years old, but the circumstances in which they have found themselves has aged them.
Child refugees needing help I am all for helping, adult men posing as such....... sickens me, I hope I am wrong.
Should we, Britain, be taking them in, in order to give children safety and security? Of course!
However some of these children who have been accepted, some of them don't look like children.
Now it may be the case, like in mine, where they look older than their years.
If they are children, and they have come from war torn Syria, then yes the travelling and the worrying will have aged some of them.
However, if it turns out that we have accepted adults posing as children, then what about the real children who are being left behind?
What about the children who literally are just that, children of 8 or 10, living on their own, or trying to look after younger siblings/ family members, and are stuck in the Calais jungle because of fraudsters?
When people were talking about bringing over child refugees, I honestly thought I was going to be seeing babies through to 10/14 year olds, not teenagers/ men.
Again, I will re-iterate that these teenagers might be 14 years old, but the circumstances in which they have found themselves has aged them.
Child refugees needing help I am all for helping, adult men posing as such....... sickens me, I hope I am wrong.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)